↓ Skip to main content

Romosozumab — on track or derailed?

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Endocrinology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Romosozumab — on track or derailed?
Published in
Nature Reviews Endocrinology, October 2017
DOI 10.1038/nrendo.2017.136
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sundeep Khosla

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 33%
Engineering 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Unknown 9 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2018.
All research outputs
#13,496,757
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Endocrinology
#1,491
of 2,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,016
of 325,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Endocrinology
#39
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.