↓ Skip to main content

Patients with CVT urgently need high-quality evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Neurology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Patients with CVT urgently need high-quality evidence
Published in
Nature Reviews Neurology, October 2017
DOI 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.143
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicoletta Riva, Alessandro Squizzato

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 15%
Professor 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 62%
Neuroscience 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2017.
All research outputs
#18,573,839
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Neurology
#1,840
of 2,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,678
of 325,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Neurology
#44
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,082 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.