↓ Skip to main content

Anisotropic failure of Fourier theory in time-domain thermoreflectance experiments

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
192 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
Title
Anisotropic failure of Fourier theory in time-domain thermoreflectance experiments
Published in
Nature Communications, October 2014
DOI 10.1038/ncomms6075
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. B. Wilson, David G. Cahill

Abstract

The applicability of Fourier's law to heat transfer problems relies on the assumption that heat carriers have mean free paths smaller than important length scales of the temperature profile. This assumption is not generally valid in nanoscale thermal transport problems where spacing between boundaries is small (<1 μm), and temperature gradients vary rapidly in space. Here we study the limits to Fourier theory for analysing three-dimensional heat transfer problems in systems with an interface. We characterize the relationship between the failure of Fourier theory, phonon mean free paths, important length scales of the temperature profile and interfacial-phonon scattering by time-domain thermoreflectance experiments on Si, Si0.99Ge0.01, boron-doped Si and MgO crystals. The failure of Fourier theory causes anisotropic thermal transport. In situations where Fourier theory fails, a simple radiative boundary condition on the heat diffusion equation cannot adequately describe interfacial thermal transport.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 202 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 35%
Researcher 31 15%
Student > Master 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Professor 15 7%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 30 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 66 31%
Physics and Astronomy 62 30%
Materials Science 33 16%
Energy 6 3%
Chemical Engineering 3 1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 36 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2014.
All research outputs
#2,934,005
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#28,026
of 46,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,579
of 253,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#337
of 687 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 687 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.