↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Site-specific group selection drives locally adapted group compositions

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
541 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Site-specific group selection drives locally adapted group compositions
Published in
Nature, October 2014
DOI 10.1038/nature13811
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan N. Pruitt, Charles J. Goodnight

Abstract

Group selection may be defined as selection caused by the differential extinction or proliferation of groups. The socially polymorphic spider Anelosimus studiosus exhibits a behavioural polymorphism in which females exhibit either a 'docile' or 'aggressive' behavioural phenotype. Natural colonies are composed of a mixture of related docile and aggressive individuals, and populations differ in colonies' characteristic docile:aggressive ratios. Using experimentally constructed colonies of known composition, here we demonstrate that population-level divergence in docile:aggressive ratios is driven by site-specific selection at the group level--certain ratios yield high survivorship at some sites but not others. Our data also indicate that colonies responded to the risk of extinction: perturbed colonies tended to adjust their composition over two generations to match the ratio characteristic of their native site, thus promoting their long-term survival in their natal habitat. However, colonies of displaced individuals continued to shift their compositions towards mixtures that would have promoted their survival had they remained at their home sites, regardless of their contemporary environment. Thus, the regulatory mechanisms that colonies use to adjust their composition appear to be locally adapted. Our data provide experimental evidence of group selection driving collective traits in wild populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 541 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 3%
United Kingdom 11 2%
Germany 5 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 7 1%
Unknown 487 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 143 26%
Researcher 77 14%
Student > Bachelor 76 14%
Student > Master 73 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 27 5%
Other 89 16%
Unknown 56 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 339 63%
Environmental Science 31 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 5%
Psychology 12 2%
Physics and Astronomy 6 1%
Other 39 7%
Unknown 88 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 213. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#186,432
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#11,249
of 98,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,646
of 266,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#167
of 1,051 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,051 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.