Title |
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Site-specific group selection drives locally adapted group compositions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1038/nature13811 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jonathan N. Pruitt, Charles J. Goodnight |
Abstract |
Group selection may be defined as selection caused by the differential extinction or proliferation of groups. The socially polymorphic spider Anelosimus studiosus exhibits a behavioural polymorphism in which females exhibit either a 'docile' or 'aggressive' behavioural phenotype. Natural colonies are composed of a mixture of related docile and aggressive individuals, and populations differ in colonies' characteristic docile:aggressive ratios. Using experimentally constructed colonies of known composition, here we demonstrate that population-level divergence in docile:aggressive ratios is driven by site-specific selection at the group level--certain ratios yield high survivorship at some sites but not others. Our data also indicate that colonies responded to the risk of extinction: perturbed colonies tended to adjust their composition over two generations to match the ratio characteristic of their native site, thus promoting their long-term survival in their natal habitat. However, colonies of displaced individuals continued to shift their compositions towards mixtures that would have promoted their survival had they remained at their home sites, regardless of their contemporary environment. Thus, the regulatory mechanisms that colonies use to adjust their composition appear to be locally adapted. Our data provide experimental evidence of group selection driving collective traits in wild populations. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 14 | 16% |
United Kingdom | 14 | 16% |
Canada | 3 | 3% |
Switzerland | 3 | 3% |
Japan | 2 | 2% |
Germany | 2 | 2% |
New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
Spain | 2 | 2% |
India | 1 | 1% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Unknown | 36 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 51 | 58% |
Scientists | 30 | 34% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 16 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 11 | 2% |
Germany | 5 | <1% |
Brazil | 4 | <1% |
Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
Canada | 3 | <1% |
Japan | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Other | 7 | 1% |
Unknown | 487 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 143 | 26% |
Researcher | 77 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 76 | 14% |
Student > Master | 73 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 27 | 5% |
Other | 89 | 16% |
Unknown | 56 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 339 | 63% |
Environmental Science | 31 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 5% |
Psychology | 12 | 2% |
Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 1% |
Other | 39 | 7% |
Unknown | 88 | 16% |