| Title |
Biopiracy ban stirs red-tape fears
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Nature, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/514014a |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Cressey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 11% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Ghana | 1 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 38 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 61 | 72% |
| Scientists | 12 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 23% |
| Researcher | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2022.
All research outputs
#431,302
of 25,641,627 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#20,735
of 98,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,213
of 265,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#351
of 1,052 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,641,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,052 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.