↓ Skip to main content

Erratum: Corrigendum: Recombination spot identification Based on gapped k-mers

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Erratum: Corrigendum: Recombination spot identification Based on gapped k-mers
Published in
Scientific Reports, December 2016
DOI 10.1038/srep35331
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rong Wang, Yong Xu, Bin Liu

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2018.
All research outputs
#666,274
of 12,680,099 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#6,606
of 59,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,139
of 273,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,680,099 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 59,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.