↓ Skip to main content

GSAASeqSP: A Toolset for Gene Set Association Analysis of RNA-Seq Data

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
GSAASeqSP: A Toolset for Gene Set Association Analysis of RNA-Seq Data
Published in
Scientific Reports, September 2014
DOI 10.1038/srep06347
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qing Xiong, Sayan Mukherjee, Terrence S. Furey

Abstract

RNA-Seq is quickly becoming the preferred method for comprehensively characterizing whole transcriptome activity, and the analysis of count data from RNA-Seq requires new computational tools. We developed GSAASeqSP, a novel toolset for genome-wide gene set association analysis of sequence count data. This toolset offers a variety of statistical procedures via combinations of multiple gene-level and gene set-level statistics, each having their own strengths under different sample and experimental conditions. These methods can be employed independently, or results generated from multiple or all methods can be integrated to determine more robust profiles of significantly altered biological pathways. Using simulations, we demonstrate the ability of these methods to identify association signals and to measure the strength of the association. We show that GSAASeqSP analyses of RNA-Seq data from diverse tissue samples provide meaningful insights into the biological mechanisms that differentiate these samples. GSAASeqSP is a powerful platform for investigating molecular underpinnings of complex traits and diseases arising from differential activity within the biological pathways. GSAASeqSP is available at http://gsaa.unc.edu.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Mexico 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 109 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 21%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Master 9 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 12 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 24%
Computer Science 6 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 16 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,805,022
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#16,765
of 142,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,687
of 256,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#70
of 707 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 707 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.