Title |
Scaling behavior of nanoimprint and nanoprinting lithography for producing nanostructures of molybdenum disulfide
|
---|---|
Published in |
Microsystems & Nanoengineering, September 2017
|
DOI | 10.1038/micronano.2017.53 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mikai Chen, Hossein Rokni, Wei Lu, Xiaogan Liang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 23% |
Researcher | 4 | 18% |
Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 7 | 32% |
Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 18% |
Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Materials Science | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2017.
All research outputs
#16,725,651
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Microsystems & Nanoengineering
#328
of 556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,072
of 323,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microsystems & Nanoengineering
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.