| Title |
Do large-scale hospital- and system-wide interventions improve patient outcomes: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-369 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robyn Clay-Williams, Hadis Nosrati, Frances C Cunningham, Kenneth Hillman, Jeffrey Braithwaite |
| Abstract |
While health care services are beginning to implement system-wide patient safety interventions, evidence on the efficacy of these interventions is sparse. We know that uptake can be variable, but we do not know the factors that affect uptake or how the interventions establish change and, in particular, whether they influence patient outcomes. We conducted a systematic review to identify how organisational and cultural factors mediate or are mediated by hospital-wide interventions, and to assess the effects of those factors on patient outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 31% |
| United States | 3 | 23% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 138 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 16% |
| Researcher | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 27 | 19% |
| Unknown | 31 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 6% |
| Psychology | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2015.
All research outputs
#4,479,764
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,025
of 8,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,387
of 244,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#30
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,604 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.