| Title |
The cellular thermal shift assay for evaluating drug target interactions in cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Protocols, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nprot.2014.138 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rozbeh Jafari, Helena Almqvist, Hanna Axelsson, Marina Ignatushchenko, Thomas Lundbäck, Pär Nordlund, Daniel Martinez Molina |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Singapore | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Lithuania | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1108 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 242 | 22% |
| Researcher | 220 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 108 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 100 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 50 | 4% |
| Other | 159 | 14% |
| Unknown | 246 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 303 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 193 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 171 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 60 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 4% |
| Other | 82 | 7% |
| Unknown | 275 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,298,597
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Protocols
#371
of 2,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,686
of 245,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Protocols
#5
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.