↓ Skip to main content

Efficient CRISPR-Cas9–mediated genome editing in Plasmodium falciparum

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
199 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
440 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Efficient CRISPR-Cas9–mediated genome editing in Plasmodium falciparum
Published in
Nature Methods, August 2014
DOI 10.1038/nmeth.3063
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey C Wagner, Randall J Platt, Stephen J Goldfless, Feng Zhang, Jacquin C Niles

Abstract

Malaria is a major cause of global morbidity and mortality, and new strategies for treating and preventing this disease are needed. Here we show that the Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 DNA endonuclease and single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) produced using T7 RNA polymerase (T7 RNAP) efficiently edit the Plasmodium falciparum genome. Targeting the genes encoding native knob-associated histidine-rich protein (kahrp) and erythrocyte binding antigen 175 (eba-175), we achieved high (≥ 50-100%) gene disruption frequencies within the usual time frame for generating transgenic parasites.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 440 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 426 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 123 28%
Researcher 87 20%
Student > Master 52 12%
Student > Bachelor 36 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 5%
Other 60 14%
Unknown 60 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 172 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 125 28%
Immunology and Microbiology 24 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 5%
Chemistry 9 2%
Other 23 5%
Unknown 66 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#922,352
of 23,956,119 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,201
of 5,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,434
of 233,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#22
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,956,119 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.