| Title |
Social cycling and conditional responses in the Rock-Paper-Scissors game
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/srep05830 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhijian Wang, Bin Xu, Hai-Jun Zhou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 261 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 29 | 11% |
| Japan | 17 | 7% |
| Russia | 13 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 5% |
| Germany | 9 | 3% |
| France | 7 | 3% |
| Spain | 6 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| Greece | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 28 | 11% |
| Unknown | 133 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 223 | 85% |
| Scientists | 27 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 4% |
| China | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 203 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 60 | 26% |
| Researcher | 37 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 12% |
| Professor | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 17% |
| Unknown | 26 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 31 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 28 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 23 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 10% |
| Engineering | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 76 | 33% |
| Unknown | 33 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 998. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2023.
All research outputs
#16,498
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#266
of 142,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87
of 240,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2
of 806 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 806 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.