↓ Skip to main content

The effect of caffeine, green tea and tyrosine on thermogenesis and energy intake

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
3 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
6 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
Title
The effect of caffeine, green tea and tyrosine on thermogenesis and energy intake
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, September 2007
DOI 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602901
Pubmed ID
Authors

A Belza, S Toubro, A Astrup

Abstract

To investigate the effect of three different food ingredients tyrosine, green tea extract (GTE) and caffeine on resting metabolic rate and haemodynamics, and on ad libitum energy intake (EI) and appetite. Twelve healthy, normal weight men (age: 23.7 +/- 2.6 years, mean +/- s.d.) participated in a four-way crossover, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Treatments were administered as tablets of 500 mg GTE, 400 mg tyrosine, 50 mg caffeine, or placebo, and were separated by >3-day washout. The acute thermogenic response was measured in a ventilated hood system for 4 h following ingestion. Blood pressure, heart rate (HR), and subjective appetite sensations were assessed hourly and ad libitum EI 4 h post-dose. Caffeine induced a thermogenic response of 6% above baseline value (72 +/- 25 kJ per 4 h, mean +/- s.e.) compared to placebo (P<0.0001). The thermogenic responses to GTE and tyrosine were not significantly different from placebo. Tyrosine tended to increase 4-h respiratory quotient by 1% compared to placebo (0.01 +/- 0.005, P=0.05). Ad libitum EI was not significantly different between treatments but was reduced by 8% (-403 +/- 183 kJ), 8% (-400 +/- 335 kJ) and 3% (-151 +/- 377 kJ) compared to placebo after intake of tyrosine, GTE and caffeine, respectively. No significant difference in haemodynamics was observed between treatments. Only caffeine was thermogenic in the given dose and caused no haemodynamic side effects. The sample size was probably too small to detect any appetite suppressant properties of the treatments. Further investigations are required.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 165 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 19%
Student > Bachelor 32 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 14%
Researcher 16 9%
Other 9 5%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 37 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 15%
Sports and Recreations 21 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 44 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 126. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2023.
All research outputs
#291,335
of 23,532,144 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#109
of 3,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#399
of 71,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,532,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.