↓ Skip to main content

NIH 'hubs' aid translation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Biotechnology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
NIH 'hubs' aid translation
Published in
Nature Biotechnology, July 2014
DOI 10.1038/nbt0714-608b
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey L Fox

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2014.
All research outputs
#18,374,472
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#7,747
of 8,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,604
of 225,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#85
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.