| Title |
Fine-tuned amplification in cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature13518 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chi V. Dang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Estonia | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 28 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 30 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2014.
All research outputs
#13,916,722
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#82,699
of 90,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,428
of 225,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#884
of 974 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.2. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 974 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.