| Title |
CloVR: A virtual machine for automated and portable sequence analysis from the desktop using cloud computing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-12-356 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samuel V Angiuoli, Malcolm Matalka, Aaron Gussman, Kevin Galens, Mahesh Vangala, David R Riley, Cesar Arze, James R White, Owen White, W Florian Fricke |
| Abstract |
Next-generation sequencing technologies have decentralized sequence acquisition, increasing the demand for new bioinformatics tools that are easy to use, portable across multiple platforms, and scalable for high-throughput applications. Cloud computing platforms provide on-demand access to computing infrastructure over the Internet and can be used in combination with custom built virtual machines to distribute pre-packaged with pre-configured software. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 19% |
| Japan | 2 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Tunisia | 1 | 4% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 63% |
| Scientists | 6 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 424 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 5% |
| Brazil | 5 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | 4% |
| Unknown | 361 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 120 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 83 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 34 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 7% |
| Other | 83 | 20% |
| Unknown | 28 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 183 | 43% |
| Computer Science | 75 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 48 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 5% |
| Engineering | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 41 | 10% |
| Unknown | 42 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2015.
All research outputs
#1,358,791
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#152
of 7,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,888
of 136,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#3
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.