| Title |
Taiwan biotech buoyed by colossal financings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Biotechnology, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nbt0614-508b |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Cyranoski |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 50% |
| Researcher | 2 | 33% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 50% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Engineering | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2014.
All research outputs
#13,714,534
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#7,110
of 8,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,708
of 228,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#69
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.