↓ Skip to main content

Taiwan biotech buoyed by colossal financings

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Biotechnology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Taiwan biotech buoyed by colossal financings
Published in
Nature Biotechnology, June 2014
DOI 10.1038/nbt0614-508b
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Cyranoski

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 50%
Researcher 2 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 17%
Engineering 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2014.
All research outputs
#4,161,758
of 9,728,122 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#3,613
of 4,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,943
of 182,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#74
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,728,122 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 56th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.1. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.