Title |
Dynamic plasticity in phototransduction regulates seasonal changes in color perception
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Communications, September 2017
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41467-017-00432-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tsuyoshi Shimmura, Tomoya Nakayama, Ai Shinomiya, Shoji Fukamachi, Masaki Yasugi, Eiji Watanabe, Takayuki Shimo, Takumi Senga, Toshiya Nishimura, Minoru Tanaka, Yasuhiro Kamei, Kiyoshi Naruse, Takashi Yoshimura |
Abstract |
To cope with seasonal changes in the environment, organisms adapt their physiology and behavior. Although color perception varies among seasons, the underlying molecular basis and its physiological significance remain unclear. Here we show that dynamic plasticity in phototransduction regulates seasonal changes in color perception in medaka fish. Medaka are active and exhibit clear phototaxis in conditions simulating summer, but remain at the bottom of the tank and fail to exhibit phototaxis in conditions simulating winter. Mate preference tests using virtual fish created with computer graphics demonstrate that medaka are more attracted to orange-red-colored model fish in summer than in winter. Transcriptome analysis of the eye reveals dynamic seasonal changes in the expression of genes encoding photopigments and their downstream pathways. Behavioral analysis of photopigment-null fish shows significant differences from wild type, suggesting that plasticity in color perception is crucial for the emergence of seasonally regulated behaviors.Animal coloration and behavior can change seasonally, but it is unclear if visual sensitivity to color shifts as well. Here, Shimmura et al. show that medaka undergo seasonal behavioral change accompanied by altered expression of opsin genes, resulting in reduced visual sensitivity to mates during winter-like conditions. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 4 | 21% |
United States | 3 | 16% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 84% |
Scientists | 3 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 18 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 11% |
Unknown | 34 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 32% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 15% |
Neuroscience | 8 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Unknown | 40 | 34% |