↓ Skip to main content

CPTAC Assay Portal: a repository of targeted proteomic assays

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
CPTAC Assay Portal: a repository of targeted proteomic assays
Published in
Nature Methods, June 2014
DOI 10.1038/nmeth.3002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey R Whiteaker, Goran N Halusa, Andrew N Hoofnagle, Vagisha Sharma, Brendan MacLean, Ping Yan, John A Wrobel, Jacob Kennedy, D R Mani, Lisa J Zimmerman, Matthew R Meyer, Mehdi Mesri, Henry Rodriguez, Amanda G Paulovich

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 102 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 27%
Researcher 21 20%
Student > Master 9 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 22 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 8%
Computer Science 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 25 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2016.
All research outputs
#2,575,884
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#2,386
of 4,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,953
of 227,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#37
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.