↓ Skip to main content

Causative novel PNKP mutations and concomitant PCDH15 mutations in a patient with microcephaly with early-onset seizures and developmental delay syndrome and hearing loss

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Human Genetics, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Causative novel PNKP mutations and concomitant PCDH15 mutations in a patient with microcephaly with early-onset seizures and developmental delay syndrome and hearing loss
Published in
Journal of Human Genetics, June 2014
DOI 10.1038/jhg.2014.51
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mitsuko Nakashima, Kyoko Takano, Hitoshi Osaka, Noriko Aida, Yoshinori Tsurusaki, Noriko Miyake, Hirotomo Saitsu, Naomichi Matsumoto

Abstract

We report on a 1-year-old boy with microcephaly with a simplified gyral pattern, early-onset seizures, congenital hearing loss and a severe developmental delay. Trio-based whole-exome sequencing identified candidate compound heterozygous mutations in two genes: c.163G>T (p.Ala55Ser) and c.874G>A (p.Gly292Arg) in polynucleotide kinase 3'-phosphatase gene (PNKP), and c.195G>A (p.Met65Ile) and c.1210A>C (p.Ser404Arg) in PCDH15. PNKP and PCDH15 mutations have been reported in autosomal recessive microcephaly with early-onset seizures and developmental delay syndrome, and Usher syndrome type 1F, respectively. Our patient showed neurological features similar to reported cases of both syndromes that could be explained by the observed mutations in both PNKP and PCDH15, which therefore appear to be pathogenic in this case.Journal of Human Genetics advance online publication, 26 June 2014; doi:10.1038/jhg.2014.51.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Other 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 13 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Psychology 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2014.
All research outputs
#18,373,874
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Human Genetics
#1,364
of 1,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,759
of 227,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Human Genetics
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.