↓ Skip to main content

Microbial communities in peatlands along a chronosequence on the Sanjiang Plain, China

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Microbial communities in peatlands along a chronosequence on the Sanjiang Plain, China
Published in
Scientific Reports, August 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-10436-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xue Zhou, Zhenqing Zhang, Lei Tian, Xiujun Li, Chunjie Tian

Abstract

Microbial communities play crucial roles in the global carbon cycle, particularly in peatland ecosystems under climate change. The peatlands of the Sanjiang Plain could be highly vulnerable to global warming because they are mainly located at the southern limit of northern peatlands. In this study, the alpha diversity and composition of bacterial communities in three different minerotrophic fens along a chronosequence were investigated. We captured a rich microbial community that included many rare operational taxonomic units (OTUs) but was dominated by a few bacterial classes that have frequently been detected in other peatland ecosystems. Notably, a large diversity of methanotrophs affiliated with Alpha- and Gammaproteobacteria was also detected. Bacterial alpha diversity and composition varied as a function of peat depth and its associated physical-chemical properties, such as total carbon, total nitrogen, pH and bulk density. We also found that bacterial community turnover (beta diversity) to be significantly correlated with soil age, whereas bacterial alpha diversity was not.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 29%
Environmental Science 11 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 18 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,025,888
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#31,685
of 124,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,104
of 315,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,386
of 5,710 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,710 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.