↓ Skip to main content

Structural basis for lipopolysaccharide insertion in the bacterial outer membrane

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
219 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Structural basis for lipopolysaccharide insertion in the bacterial outer membrane
Published in
Nature, June 2014
DOI 10.1038/nature13484
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuai Qiao, Qingshan Luo, Yan Zhao, Xuejun Cai Zhang, Yihua Huang

Abstract

One of the fundamental properties of biological membranes is the asymmetric distribution of membrane lipids. In Gram-negative bacteria, the outer leaflet of the outer membrane is composed predominantly of lipopolysaccharides (LPS). The export of LPS requires seven essential lipopolysaccharide transport (Lpt) proteins to move LPS from the inner membrane, through the periplasm to the surface. Of the seven Lpt proteins, the LptD-LptE complex is responsible for inserting LPS into the external leaflet of the outer membrane. Here we report the crystal structure of the ∼110-kilodalton membrane protein complex LptD-LptE from Shigella flexneri at 2.4 Å resolution. The structure reveals an unprecedented two-protein plug-and-barrel architecture with LptE embedded into a 26-stranded β-barrel formed by LptD. Importantly, the secondary structures of the first two β-strands are distorted by two proline residues, weakening their interactions with neighbouring β-strands and creating a potential portal on the barrel wall that could allow lateral diffusion of LPS into the outer membrane. The crystal structure of the LptD-LptE complex opens the door to new antibiotic strategies targeting the bacterial outer membrane.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 225 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 26%
Researcher 44 19%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Professor 11 5%
Student > Master 11 5%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 46 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 61 26%
Chemistry 27 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 3%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 50 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2015.
All research outputs
#1,278,095
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#35,672
of 97,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,439
of 242,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#558
of 1,012 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,012 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.