| Title |
Seafood stewardship in crisis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1038/467028a |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer Jacquet, Daniel Pauly, David Ainley, Sidney Holt, Paul Dayton, Jeremy Jackson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 43% |
| Denmark | 1 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 50% |
| Scientists | 5 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 510 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 2% |
| Unknown | 465 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 108 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 91 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 10% |
| Other | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 91 | 18% |
| Unknown | 62 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 178 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 140 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 31 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 21 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 3% |
| Other | 58 | 11% |
| Unknown | 65 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2023.
All research outputs
#417,925
of 23,979,422 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#20,264
of 93,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#995
of 96,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#28
of 602 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,979,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 101.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 602 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.