↓ Skip to main content

Fitness consequences of peak reproductive effort in a resource pulse system

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Fitness consequences of peak reproductive effort in a resource pulse system
Published in
Scientific Reports, August 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-09724-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anni Hämäläinen, Andrew G. McAdam, Ben Dantzer, Jeffrey E. Lane, Jessica A. Haines, Murray M. Humphries, Stan Boutin

Abstract

The age trajectory of reproductive performance of many iteroparous species features an early - life increase in performance followed by a late - life senescent decline. The largest contribution of lifetime reproductive success is therefore gained at the age at which reproductive performance peaks. Using long term data on North American red squirrels we show that the environmental conditions individuals encountered could cause variation among individuals in the "height" and timing of this peak, contributing to life history variation and fitness in this population that experiences irregular resource pulses. As expected, high peak effort was positively associated with lifetime reproductive output up to a high level of annual effort. Furthermore, individuals that matched their peak reproductive effort to an anticipated resource pulse gained substantial fitness benefits through recruiting more offspring over their lifetime. Individual variation in peak reproductive effort thus has strong potential to shape life history evolution by facilitating adaptation to fluctuating environments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Professor 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 47%
Environmental Science 6 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2018.
All research outputs
#698,416
of 25,175,727 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#7,584
of 138,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,546
of 322,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#307
of 5,884 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,175,727 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 138,393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,884 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.