↓ Skip to main content

Surgical outcomes from limiting the use of nonabsorbable suture in tunica albuginea plication for Peyronie’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Impotence Research, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Surgical outcomes from limiting the use of nonabsorbable suture in tunica albuginea plication for Peyronie’s disease
Published in
International Journal of Impotence Research, August 2017
DOI 10.1038/ijir.2017.34
Pubmed ID
Authors

D Papagiannopoulos, J Phelps, E Yura, L A Levine

Abstract

Tunica albuginea plication (TAP) surgery for Peyronie's disease (PD) is classically described using nonabsorbable suture. Many patients are aware of nodularity at the suture sites (50-88%), and some find them painful (10-33%). We explore whether limiting permanent sutures provides a durable correction of curve and report the incidence of bothersome nodules. Beginning in 2007, we modified our TAP procedure to limit the use of permanent sutures. We reviewed all patients who underwent TAP procedures from 2007 to 2014 at our institution. Patients were contacted to complete a previously published survey regarding postoperative satisfaction. In total, 142 PD patients underwent the TAP procedure and 81/142 (57%) completed the postoperative survey. Mean office follow-up and survey follow-up were 17.3 and 56.3 months, respectively. Of the surveyed patients, 6.2% complained of a bothersome residual curve, 19.8% experienced nodularity and 4.9% reported bothersome nodules. Men with dorsal curves experienced less painful nodularity than those with ventral (P=0.047) or lateral curves (P=0.017). In total, 4/142 (2.8%) of men underwent repeat intervention. At long-term follow-up, limiting permanent sutures during TAP procedures for PD is durable with respect to curvature correction and has encouragingly low levels of nodularity and bother at suture sites.International Journal of Impotence Research advance online publication, 24 August 2017; doi:10.1038/ijir.2017.34.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 63%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2023.
All research outputs
#13,970,130
of 24,710,887 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Impotence Research
#909
of 1,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,750
of 321,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Impotence Research
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,710,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.