↓ Skip to main content

Conditional selection determines the pathways of cancer evolution

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Conditional selection determines the pathways of cancer evolution
Published in
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, August 2017
DOI 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.129
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Killock

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 36%
Professor 2 18%
Other 2 18%
Researcher 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Computer Science 1 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2017.
All research outputs
#4,385,528
of 25,928,676 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
#953
of 2,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,259
of 330,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
#41
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,928,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.