↓ Skip to main content

The case for and against autonomous weapon systems

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Human Behaviour, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
The case for and against autonomous weapon systems
Published in
Nature Human Behaviour, August 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41562-017-0182-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

James Dawes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Other 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 3 18%
Engineering 3 18%
Psychology 2 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 3 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,885,978
of 25,303,733 outputs
Outputs from Nature Human Behaviour
#1,437
of 1,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,444
of 323,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Human Behaviour
#60
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,303,733 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 159.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.