↓ Skip to main content

Transcriptional risk scores link GWAS to eQTLs and predict complications in Crohn's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
78 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
293 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Transcriptional risk scores link GWAS to eQTLs and predict complications in Crohn's disease
Published in
Nature Genetics, August 2017
DOI 10.1038/ng.3936
Pubmed ID
Authors

Urko M Marigorta, Lee A Denson, Jeffrey S Hyams, Kajari Mondal, Jarod Prince, Thomas D Walters, Anne Griffiths, Joshua D Noe, Wallace V Crandall, Joel R Rosh, David R Mack, Richard Kellermayer, Melvin B Heyman, Susan S Baker, Michael C Stephens, Robert N Baldassano, James F Markowitz, Mi-Ok Kim, Marla C Dubinsky, Judy Cho, Bruce J Aronow, Subra Kugathasan, Greg Gibson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 293 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 72 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 22%
Student > Master 25 9%
Other 20 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 49 17%
Unknown 46 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 75 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 3%
Computer Science 7 2%
Other 27 9%
Unknown 66 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,031,736
of 25,845,895 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#1,745
of 7,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,498
of 328,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#34
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.