↓ Skip to main content

Measuring inter-protein pairwise interaction energies from a single native mass spectrum by double-mutant cycle analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Measuring inter-protein pairwise interaction energies from a single native mass spectrum by double-mutant cycle analysis
Published in
Nature Communications, August 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-00285-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miri Sokolovski, Jelena Cveticanin, Déborah Hayoun, Ilia Korobko, Michal Sharon, Amnon Horovitz

Abstract

The strength and specificity of protein complex formation is crucial for most life processes and is determined by interactions between residues in the binding partners. Double-mutant cycle analysis provides a strategy for studying the energetic coupling between amino acids at the interfaces of such complexes. Here we show that these pairwise interaction energies can be determined from a single high-resolution native mass spectrum by measuring the intensities of the complexes formed by the two wild-type proteins, the complex of each wild-type protein with a mutant protein, and the complex of the two mutant proteins. This native mass spectrometry approach, which obviates the need for error-prone measurements of binding constants, can provide information regarding multiple interactions in a single spectrum much like nuclear Overhauser effects (NOEs) in nuclear magnetic resonance. Importantly, our results show that specific inter-protein contacts in solution are maintained in the gas phase.Double mutant cycle (DMC) analyses can provide the interaction energies between amino acids at the interface of protein complexes. Here, the authors determine pairwise interaction energies using high-resolution native mass spectroscopy, offering a straightforward route for the DMC methodology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 32%
Student > Master 5 26%
Researcher 4 21%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 26%
Chemistry 4 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 21%
Mathematics 1 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2018.
All research outputs
#2,678,083
of 22,997,544 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#27,081
of 47,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,004
of 318,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#537
of 868 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,997,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 868 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.