| Title |
Effect of early skin-to-skin contact following normal delivery on incidence of hypothermia in neonates more than 1800 g: randomized control trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Perinatology, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/jp.2014.15 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S M Nimbalkar, V K Patel, D V Patel, A S Nimbalkar, A Sethi, A Phatak |
| Abstract |
To investigate the impact of early skin-to-skin contact (SSC) provided for first 24 h on incidence of hypothermia in stable newborns weighing 1800 g or more during first 48 h of life. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 15% |
| India | 2 | 15% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Hungary | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Turkey | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 31% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 191 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 14% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 21% |
| Unknown | 45 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 22% |
| Psychology | 11 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 48 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,432,893
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Perinatology
#148
of 2,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,624
of 224,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Perinatology
#4
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.