↓ Skip to main content

Tailoring optogenetic illumination through tapered fibers

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Tailoring optogenetic illumination through tapered fibers
Published in
Nature Methods, August 2017
DOI 10.1038/nmeth.4381
Authors

Nina Vogt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Researcher 4 27%
Student > Master 3 20%
Professor 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 6 40%
Engineering 4 27%
Physics and Astronomy 3 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,536,586
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#3,651
of 4,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,719
of 317,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#56
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.