| Title |
Nanotechnology tackles tumours
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Nanotechnology, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nnano.2006.188 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuanfang Liu, Haifang Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 27% |
| Researcher | 7 | 27% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 3 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 4 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 15% |
| Engineering | 3 | 12% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 12% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,536,586
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Nature Nanotechnology
#2,540
of 3,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,496
of 157,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Nanotechnology
#16
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.