| Title |
Funders punish open-access dodgers
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Nature, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/508161a |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard Van Noorden |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 736 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 167 | 23% |
| United States | 132 | 18% |
| Canada | 32 | 4% |
| Australia | 21 | 3% |
| Germany | 17 | 2% |
| France | 10 | 1% |
| Spain | 10 | 1% |
| Japan | 9 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 82 | 11% |
| Unknown | 248 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 477 | 65% |
| Scientists | 170 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 62 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 27 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 12 | 22% |
| Researcher | 12 | 22% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Professor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 3 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 11 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 30% |
| Unknown | 4 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 590. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2017.
All research outputs
#39,945
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#3,452
of 98,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230
of 242,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#24
of 1,002 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,002 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.