↓ Skip to main content

Predicting the spread of the Asian hornet (Vespa velutina) following its incursion into Great Britain

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
15 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
Predicting the spread of the Asian hornet (Vespa velutina) following its incursion into Great Britain
Published in
Scientific Reports, July 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-06212-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matt J. Keeling, Daniel N. Franklin, Samik Datta, Mike A. Brown, Giles E. Budge

Abstract

The yellow-legged or Asian hornet (Vespa velutina) is native to South-East Asia, and is a voracious predator of pollinating insects including honey bees. Since its accidental introduction into South-Western France in 2004, V. velutina has spread to much of western Europe. The presence of V. velutina in Great Britain was first confirmed in September 2016. The likely dynamics following an initial incursion are uncertain, especially the risk of continued spread, and the likely success of control measures. Here we extrapolate from the situation in France to quantify the potential invasion of V. velutina in Great Britain. We find that, without control, V. velutina could colonise the British mainland rapidly, depending upon how the Asian hornet responds to the colder climate in Britain compared to France. The announcement that a second hornet had been discovered in Somerset, increases the chance that the invasion first occurred before 2016. We therefore consider the likely site of first invasion and the probabilistic position of additional founding nests in late 2016 and early 2017. Given the potential dispersion of V. velutina, we conclude that vigilance is required over a large area to prevent the establishment of this threat to the pollinator population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 151 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 20%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Master 15 10%
Other 9 6%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 46 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 33%
Environmental Science 25 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 52 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#628,428
of 25,312,451 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#6,872
of 139,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,148
of 322,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#276
of 5,916 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,312,451 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 139,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,916 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.