↓ Skip to main content

Design of new Mott multiferroics via complete charge transfer: promising candidates for bulk photovoltaics

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Design of new Mott multiferroics via complete charge transfer: promising candidates for bulk photovoltaics
Published in
Scientific Reports, July 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-06396-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanghui Chen, Andrew Millis

Abstract

Optimal materials to induce bulk photovoltaic effects should lack inversion symmetry and have an optical gap matching the energies of visible radiation. Ferroelectric perovskite oxides such as BaTiO3 and PbTiO3 exhibit substantial polarization and stability, but have the disadvantage of excessively large band gaps. We use both density functional theory and dynamical mean field theory calculations to design a new class of Mott multiferroics-double perovskite oxides A 2VFeO6 (A = Ba, Pb, etc). While neither perovskite AVO3 nor AFeO3 is ferroelectric, in the double perovskite A 2VFeO6 a 'complete' charge transfer from V to Fe leads to a non-bulk-like charge configuration-an empty V-d shell and a half-filled Fe-d shell, giving rise to a polarization comparable to that of ferroelectric ATiO3. Different from nonmagnetic ATiO3, the new double perovskite oxides have an antiferromagnetic ground state and around room temperatures, are paramagnetic Mott insulators. Most importantly, the V d (0) state significantly reduces the band gap of A 2VFeO6, making it smaller than that of ATiO3 and BiFeO3 and rendering the new multiferroics a promising candidate to induce bulk photovoltaic effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 33%
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Master 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Other 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 13 29%
Materials Science 9 20%
Engineering 3 7%
Chemistry 3 7%
Energy 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 12 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2017.
All research outputs
#15,018,673
of 24,286,850 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#69,932
of 131,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,415
of 317,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2,874
of 5,760 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,286,850 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 131,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,760 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.