| Title |
Identification of the 100 richest dietary sources of polyphenols: an application of the Phenol-Explorer database
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ejcn.2010.221 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J Pérez-Jiménez, V Neveu, F Vos, A Scalbert |
| Abstract |
The diversity of the chemical structures of dietary polyphenols makes it difficult to estimate their total content in foods, and also to understand the role of polyphenols in health and the prevention of diseases. Global redox colorimetric assays have commonly been used to estimate the total polyphenol content in foods. However, these assays lack specificity. Contents of individual polyphenols have been determined by chromatography. These data, scattered in several hundred publications, have been compiled in the Phenol-Explorer database. The aim of this paper is to identify the 100 richest dietary sources of polyphenols using this database. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 27% |
| Spain | 2 | 18% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 929 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 911 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 140 | 15% |
| Researcher | 122 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 116 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 107 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 63 | 7% |
| Other | 126 | 14% |
| Unknown | 255 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 200 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 88 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 52 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 45 | 5% |
| Other | 155 | 17% |
| Unknown | 311 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 360. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#90,323
of 25,755,403 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#37
of 4,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210
of 110,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#1
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,755,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.