Title |
Tracing the Vedic Saraswati River in the Great Rann of Kachchh
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, July 2017
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41598-017-05745-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nitesh Khonde, Sunil Kumar Singh, D. M. Maurya, Vinai K. Rai, L. S. Chamyal, Liviu Giosan |
Abstract |
The lost Saraswati River mentioned in the ancient Indian tradition is postulated to have flown independently of the Indus River into the Arabian Sea, perhaps along courses of now defunct rivers such as Ghaggar, Hakra and Nara. The persistence of such a river during the Harappan Bronze Age and the Iron Age Vedic period is strongly debated. We drilled in the Great Rann of Kachchh (Kutch), an infilled gulf of the Arabian Sea, which must have received input from the Saraswati, if active. Nd and Sr isotopic measurements suggest that a distinct source may have been present before 10 ka. Later in Holocene, under a drying climate, sediments from the Thar Desert probably choked the signature of an independent Saraswati-like river. Alternatively, without excluding a Saraswati-like secondary source, the Indus and the Thar were the dominant sources throughout the post-glacial history of the GRK. Indus-derived sediment accelerated the infilling of GRK after ~6 ka when the Indus delta started to grow. Until its complete infilling few centuries ago, freshwater input from the Indus, and perhaps from the Ghaggar-Hakra-Nara, probably sustained a productive marine environment as well as navigability toward old coastal Harappan and historic towns in the region. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 483 | 44% |
United States | 30 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 8 | <1% |
Canada | 4 | <1% |
Australia | 4 | <1% |
Indonesia | 3 | <1% |
United Arab Emirates | 3 | <1% |
Singapore | 3 | <1% |
Saudi Arabia | 2 | <1% |
Other | 13 | 1% |
Unknown | 551 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1023 | 93% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 32 | 3% |
Scientists | 30 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 1% |
Unknown | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 33% |
Researcher | 22 | 23% |
Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
Professor | 6 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 14% |
Unknown | 11 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 51 | 54% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
Engineering | 3 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Unknown | 23 | 24% |