↓ Skip to main content

Plant recording across two centuries reveals dramatic changes in species diversity of a Mediterranean archipelago

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Plant recording across two centuries reveals dramatic changes in species diversity of a Mediterranean archipelago
Published in
Scientific Reports, July 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-05114-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandro Chiarucci, Simone Fattorini, Bruno Foggi, Sara Landi, Lorenzo Lazzaro, János Podani, Daniel Simberloff

Abstract

Although islands are model systems for investigating assembly of biological communities, long-term changes in archipelago communities are not well understood because of the lack of reliable data. By using a vast amount of floristic data we assembled a dataset of the plant species occurring on 16 islands of the Tuscan Archipelago, Italy, across two periods, 1830-1950 and 1951-2015. We collected 10,892 occurrence records for 1,831 species. We found major changes in the island plant assemblages between the two periods, with native flora significantly decreasing (-10.7%) and alien flora doubling (+132.1%) in richness. The species-area relationships demonstrated the scale-dependence of the observed changes for native and alien species. The observed floristic changes were dependent on island area, with smaller islands displaying high variability in richness and compositional changes and larger islands having more stable species assemblages. The richness of species associated with open landscapes, that had been maintained for centuries by traditional practices, markedly reduced while the number of woody species, associated with afforestation processes and invasion by alien woody plants, significantly incresed. These results demonstrate the great power of floristic studies, often available in grey literature, for understanding long-term biotic changes in insular ecosystems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Professor 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 19 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2017.
All research outputs
#6,162,193
of 22,988,380 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#41,589
of 124,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,067
of 312,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,716
of 5,406 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,988,380 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,406 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.