| Title |
Urinary incontinence in women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Disease Primers, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nrdp.2017.43 |
| Pubmed ID |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Mexico | 2 | 13% |
| Turkey | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Peru | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 23% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 16% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 55% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,324,940
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Disease Primers
#647
of 709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,121
of 314,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Disease Primers
#24
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 74.9. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.