↓ Skip to main content

Applying regenerative medicine techniques in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery: the bar has been set high

Overview of attention for article published in npj Regenerative Medicine, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Applying regenerative medicine techniques in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery: the bar has been set high
Published in
npj Regenerative Medicine, June 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41536-017-0025-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew Q. Miller, Stephen S. Park, J. Jared Christophel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2017.
All research outputs
#12,849,367
of 22,981,247 outputs
Outputs from npj Regenerative Medicine
#208
of 267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,888
of 316,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from npj Regenerative Medicine
#11
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,981,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.