| Title |
Nondaily smoking: a population-based, longitudinal study of stability and predictors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-123 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elisabeth Kvaavik, Tilmann von Soest, Willy Pedersen |
| Abstract |
Nondaily smoking appears to have remained stable in Western countries in recent years, alongside a steep decline in daily smoking. Nondaily smoking increases the risk of several diseases and premature mortality, but our knowledge about nondaily smoking is limited. The present study was designed to examine the stability of nondaily smoking during young adulthood, and to identify adolescent factors predictive of nondaily smoking compared with nonsmoking and non-nicotine-dependent and nicotine-dependent daily smoking. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 43% |
| Norway | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 10 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 22 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2015.
All research outputs
#2,238,718
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,555
of 14,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,126
of 307,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#45
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.