↓ Skip to main content

Acetyl-CoA synthetase regulates histone acetylation and hippocampal memory

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
183 X users
patent
3 patents
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
341 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
511 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Acetyl-CoA synthetase regulates histone acetylation and hippocampal memory
Published in
Nature, May 2017
DOI 10.1038/nature22405
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philipp Mews, Greg Donahue, Adam M. Drake, Vincent Luczak, Ted Abel, Shelley L. Berger

Abstract

Metabolic production of acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) is linked to histone acetylation and gene regulation, but the precise mechanisms of this process are largely unknown. Here we show that the metabolic enzyme acetyl-CoA synthetase 2 (ACSS2) directly regulates histone acetylation in neurons and spatial memory in mammals. In a neuronal cell culture model, ACSS2 increases in the nuclei of differentiating neurons and localizes to upregulated neuronal genes near sites of elevated histone acetylation. A decrease in ACSS2 lowers nuclear acetyl-CoA levels, histone acetylation, and responsive expression of the cohort of neuronal genes. In adult mice, attenuation of hippocampal ACSS2 expression impairs long-term spatial memory, a cognitive process that relies on histone acetylation. A decrease in ACSS2 in the hippocampus also leads to defective upregulation of memory-related neuronal genes that are pre-bound by ACSS2. These results reveal a connection between cellular metabolism, gene regulation, and neural plasticity and establish a link between acetyl-CoA generation 'on-site' at chromatin for histone acetylation and the transcription of key neuronal genes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 183 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 511 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Unknown 508 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 132 26%
Researcher 69 14%
Student > Bachelor 57 11%
Student > Master 43 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 5%
Other 78 15%
Unknown 104 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 150 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 17%
Neuroscience 74 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 2%
Other 41 8%
Unknown 115 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 237. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2023.
All research outputs
#161,815
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#10,106
of 98,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,346
of 331,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#203
of 817 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 817 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.