Title |
Within-group male relatedness reduces harm to females in Drosophila
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1038/nature12949 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Pau Carazo, Cedric K. W. Tan, Felicity Allen, Stuart Wigby, Tommaso Pizzari |
Abstract |
To resolve the mechanisms that switch competition to cooperation is key to understanding biological organization. This is particularly relevant for intrasexual competition, which often leads to males harming females. Recent theory proposes that kin selection may modulate female harm by relaxing competition among male relatives. Here we experimentally manipulate the relatedness of groups of male Drosophila melanogaster competing over females to demonstrate that, as expected, within-group relatedness inhibits male competition and female harm. Females exposed to groups of three brothers unrelated to the female had higher lifetime reproductive success and slower reproductive ageing compared to females exposed to groups of three males unrelated to each other. Triplets of brothers also fought less with each other, courted females less intensively and lived longer than triplets of unrelated males. However, associations among brothers may be vulnerable to invasion by minorities of unrelated males: when two brothers were matched with an unrelated male, the unrelated male sired on average twice as many offspring as either brother. These results demonstrate that relatedness can profoundly affect fitness through its modulation of intrasexual competition, as flies plastically adjust sexual behaviour in a manner consistent with kin-selection theory. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 13 | 22% |
United States | 8 | 13% |
Spain | 5 | 8% |
Australia | 4 | 7% |
Canada | 3 | 5% |
France | 2 | 3% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Hungary | 1 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 16 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 31 | 52% |
Scientists | 27 | 45% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 3% |
Switzerland | 4 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
China | 2 | <1% |
France | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Hungary | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 2% |
Unknown | 221 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 25% |
Researcher | 55 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 28 | 11% |
Student > Master | 23 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 5% |
Other | 33 | 13% |
Unknown | 34 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 157 | 63% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 10 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 7 | 3% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 2% |
Other | 15 | 6% |
Unknown | 37 | 15% |