↓ Skip to main content

Dental caries

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Disease Primers, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Dental caries
Published in
Nature Reviews Disease Primers, May 2017
DOI 10.1038/nrdp.2017.31
Pubmed ID

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 2%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Student > Master 1 2%
Unknown 48 94%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Unknown 48 94%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,974,158
of 18,978,726 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Disease Primers
#494
of 595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,346
of 280,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Disease Primers
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,978,726 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them