| Title |
Genomic epidemiology reveals multiple introductions of Zika virus into the United States
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature22400 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nathan D. Grubaugh, Jason T. Ladner, Moritz U. G. Kraemer, Gytis Dudas, Amanda L. Tan, Karthik Gangavarapu, Michael R. Wiley, Stephen White, Julien Thézé, Diogo M. Magnani, Karla Prieto, Daniel Reyes, Andrea M. Bingham, Lauren M. Paul, Refugio Robles-Sikisaka, Glenn Oliveira, Darryl Pronty, Carolyn M. Barcellona, Hayden C. Metsky, Mary Lynn Baniecki, Kayla G. Barnes, Bridget Chak, Catherine A. Freije, Adrianne Gladden-Young, Andreas Gnirke, Cynthia Luo, Bronwyn MacInnis, Christian B. Matranga, Daniel J. Park, James Qu, Stephen F. Schaffner, Christopher Tomkins-Tinch, Kendra L. West, Sarah M. Winnicki, Shirlee Wohl, Nathan L. Yozwiak, Joshua Quick, Joseph R. Fauver, Kamran Khan, Shannon E. Brent, Robert C. Reiner, Paola N. Lichtenberger, Michael J. Ricciardi, Varian K. Bailey, David I. Watkins, Marshall R. Cone, Edgar W. Kopp, Kelly N. Hogan, Andrew C. Cannons, Reynald Jean, Andrew J. Monaghan, Robert F. Garry, Nicholas J. Loman, Nuno R. Faria, Mario C. Porcelli, Chalmers Vasquez, Elyse R. Nagle, Derek A. T. Cummings, Danielle Stanek, Andrew Rambaut, Mariano Sanchez-Lockhart, Pardis C. Sabeti, Leah D. Gillis, Scott F. Michael, Trevor Bedford, Oliver G. Pybus, Sharon Isern, Gustavo Palacios, Kristian G. Andersen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 302 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 110 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 19 | 6% |
| France | 8 | 3% |
| Australia | 6 | 2% |
| India | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 4 | 1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 31 | 10% |
| Unknown | 110 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 182 | 60% |
| Scientists | 88 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 430 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 426 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 85 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 77 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 11% |
| Professor | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 75 | 17% |
| Unknown | 70 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 91 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 73 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 37 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 82 | 19% |
| Unknown | 95 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 910. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#19,505
of 25,930,295 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#1,922
of 99,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#315
of 330,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#23
of 814 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,930,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 814 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.