↓ Skip to main content

Application of rare variant transmission disequilibrium tests to epileptic encephalopathy trio sequence data

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Human Genetics, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Application of rare variant transmission disequilibrium tests to epileptic encephalopathy trio sequence data
Published in
European Journal of Human Genetics, May 2017
DOI 10.1038/ejhg.2017.61
Pubmed ID
Abstract

The classic epileptic encephalopathies, including infantile spasms (IS) and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), are severe seizure disorders that usually arise sporadically. De novo variants in genes mainly encoding ion channel and synaptic proteins have been found to account for over 15% of patients with IS or LGS. The contribution of autosomal recessive genetic variation, however, is less well understood. We implemented a rare variant transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) to search for autosomal recessive epileptic encephalopathy genes in a cohort of 320 outbred patient-parent trios that were generally prescreened for rare metabolic disorders. In the current sample, our rare variant transmission disequilibrium test did not identify individual genes with significantly distorted transmission over expectation after correcting for the multiple tests. While the rare variant transmission disequilibrium test did not find evidence of a role for individual autosomal recessive genes, our current sample is insufficiently powered to assess the overall role of autosomal recessive genotypes in an outbred epileptic encephalopathy population.European Journal of Human Genetics advance online publication, 17 May 2017; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2017.61.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 15%
Professor 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Other 6 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 14 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 29%
Neuroscience 8 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 18 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2020.
All research outputs
#14,346,585
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Human Genetics
#2,692
of 3,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,206
of 313,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Human Genetics
#31
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.