↓ Skip to main content

Persistent 400,000-year variability of Antarctic ice volume and the carbon cycle is revealed throughout the Plio-Pleistocene

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
Title
Persistent 400,000-year variability of Antarctic ice volume and the carbon cycle is revealed throughout the Plio-Pleistocene
Published in
Nature Communications, January 2014
DOI 10.1038/ncomms3999
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. de Boer, Lucas J. Lourens, Roderik S.W. van de Wal

Abstract

Marine sediment records from the Oligocene and Miocene reveal clear 400,000-year climate cycles related to variations in orbital eccentricity. These cycles are also observed in the Plio-Pleistocene records of the global carbon cycle. However, they are absent from the Late Pleistocene ice-age record over the past 1.5 million years. Here we present a simulation of global ice volume over the past 5 million years with a coupled system of four three-dimensional ice-sheet models. Our simulation shows that the 400,000-year long eccentricity cycles of Antarctica vary coherently with δ(13)C data during the Pleistocene, suggesting that they drove the long-term carbon cycle changes throughout the past 35 million years. The 400,000-year response of Antarctica was eventually suppressed by the dominant 100,000-year glacial cycles of the large ice sheets in the Northern Hemisphere.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 133 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 29%
Researcher 30 21%
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 15 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 74 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Environmental Science 9 6%
Physics and Astronomy 5 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 32 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,467,225
of 24,622,191 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#28,100
of 53,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,321
of 316,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#212
of 430 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,622,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 430 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.