| Title |
The gut–microbiome–brain connection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Neuroscience, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nrn3669 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Monica Hoyos Flight |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 15% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 77% |
| Scientists | 3 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 9% |
| Professor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 24% |
| Unknown | 10 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 18 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 10% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#2,122,746
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#866
of 2,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,270
of 322,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#6
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,778 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.