Title |
Erosion by cooling
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.1038/504380a |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David Lundbek Egholm |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 4 | 29% |
Saudi Arabia | 2 | 14% |
Puerto Rico | 1 | 7% |
Spain | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
Researcher | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 11 | 79% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Engineering | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 11 | 79% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2014.
All research outputs
#1,635,469
of 24,514,423 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#38,983
of 95,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,678
of 317,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#575
of 930 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,514,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 95,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 101.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 930 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.