↓ Skip to main content

Detection of subsurface structures underneath dendrites formed on cycled lithium metal electrodes

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Materials, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
6 X users
patent
17 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
744 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
696 Mendeley
Title
Detection of subsurface structures underneath dendrites formed on cycled lithium metal electrodes
Published in
Nature Materials, November 2013
DOI 10.1038/nmat3793
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine J. Harry, Daniel T. Hallinan, Dilworth Y. Parkinson, Alastair A. MacDowell, Nitash P. Balsara

Abstract

Failure caused by dendrite growth in high-energy-density, rechargeable batteries with lithium metal anodes has prevented their widespread use in applications ranging from consumer electronics to electric vehicles. Efforts to solve the lithium dendrite problem have focused on preventing the growth of protrusions from the anode surface. Synchrotron hard X-ray microtomography experiments on symmetric lithium-polymer-lithium cells cycled at 90 °C show that during the early stage of dendrite development, the bulk of the dendritic structure lies within the electrode, underneath the polymer/electrode interface. Furthermore, we observed crystalline impurities, present in the uncycled lithium anodes, at the base of the subsurface dendritic structures. The portion of the dendrite protruding into the electrolyte increases on cycling until it spans the electrolyte thickness, causing a short circuit. Contrary to conventional wisdom, it seems that preventing dendrite formation in polymer electrolytes depends on inhibiting the formation of subsurface structures in the lithium electrode.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 696 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Singapore 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 672 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 233 33%
Researcher 118 17%
Student > Master 81 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 51 7%
Student > Bachelor 36 5%
Other 68 10%
Unknown 109 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 168 24%
Chemistry 154 22%
Engineering 107 15%
Chemical Engineering 45 6%
Energy 37 5%
Other 47 7%
Unknown 138 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#703,671
of 23,394,907 outputs
Outputs from Nature Materials
#737
of 4,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,818
of 305,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Materials
#10
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,394,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.